Featured in Health Data Management
Following a checklist of key steps can help information executives better manage the data in their systems.
In the classic Star Trek episode, “The Trouble with Tribbles,” a space station is overrun by small, fast-reproducing creatures that take up all available space and prove impossible to control. It’s sort of like the problems healthcare systems have with data.
Systems are struggling to harness their data and put it to use on their behalf. While a lot of attention is paid to patient data, the handling of provider information is equally as important.
Provider data is generated by individual practitioners and healthcare organizations. It generally can be divided into two types – information that helps identify and match individuals and information with value to business applications.
Individual information includes such things as names, addresses, phone numbers, NPI, state license, Drug Enforcement Administration ID and other Medicare and Medicaid IDs. The business application identity includes such things as application-specific IDs, credentials, specialties, education, languages spoken, accepted insurance networks, and relationship data on affiliations and volume of services performed along with referral patterns.
Provider data is critical for healthcare operations, powering important initiatives from smarter growth to better care. It affects back-of-house operations as well as patient-facing activities.
As healthcare organizations expand and systems merge, managing provider data becomes more challenging with additional providers to track, more sources of data and more domains exchanging information.
The state of provider data management
To ascertain the state of provider data management in healthcare systems, the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) recently surveyed members about their organizations.
Asked how important provider data management is to the overall success of their organization, four of five respondents on the CHIME survey rated it as “important” or “very important.” When the survey asked which organizational objectives rely on accurate and effective provider data management, the top three answers were all patient-related – efficient care delivery, patient safety and patient digital experience.
But for all the importance of information, healthcare organizations are not doing a good job of managing provider data. Asked to grade their organization’s handling of the data, 41 percent of survey respondents gave themselves a “C,” while 55 percent marked “B.” No one chose “A.”
Survey respondents then were asked to identify the biggest obstacles to provider data management. Among their top answers, 68 percent cited data conflicts across systems (no single source of truth); 63 percent said data is fragmented and siloed; and 59 percent said data is inaccurate, out of date or incomplete.
Provider data is a challenge to manage for several reasons.
First, it’s varied. It can represent different types of entities – a person, a location and sometimes, both. Also, it has an intricate structural hierarchy with limitless combinations of critical attributes. This can cause errors and exclusions, which further contributes to the complexity of rationalizing all forms of provider data.
Second, it changes constantly. As providers change when, where and what services they offer, it’s difficult to keep current.
Finally, it has different applications. The data is used and modified across many parts of the organization, making quality control difficult to achieve.
The upshot is that 68 percent of CHIME survey respondents said they were concerned about the quality of provider data at their organization, and 27 percent said their stakeholders do not trust provider data/analytics outputs. They want a single source of truth for data (95 percent say it’s critical) and to be able to manage provider and patient data together (mentioned by 59 percent).
Asked what qualities they’d like to see in provider data management at their organization, they cited accuracy, security, total cost of ownership, reference and enrichment data, and data stewardship tools.
Checklist for success in data management
Effectively managing provider data is crucial for healthcare organizations to streamline operations, maintain compliance and ensure the quality of care. To achieve this, organizations should focus on key capabilities and best practices. Here’s a comprehensive checklist for success in managing provider data.
Provider identity resolution. Ensuring accurate identification of providers across the organization and different applications is foundational. Best practices include:
- High-level accuracy.Ensure precise matching of provider identities across systems.
- Referential matching. Use native referential matching to ensure seamless data integration.
- Match tier technology. Incorporate varying degrees of data quality without compromising future matching decisions, allowing flexibility in managing less reliable data.
Centralized data management. Creating a unified data hub that distributes accurate provider data throughout the organization is essential. Look for:
- User-friendly data stewardship tools. Implement intuitive workflows for data governance and management.
- Data mastering. Establish and maintain a single source of truth for provider data.
- Flexible data model. Adopt a data model that accommodates multiple domains (for example, provider and patient).
- Cross-domain relationships. Manage relationships between providers, patients and other entities across multiple domains.
Data enrichment. Strengthening and completing data sets through enrichment with trusted, up-to-date information improves data accuracy and usability. Important considerations include.
- Filling missing demographics and contact or location data. Ensure all data is complete and up to date.
- Provider licensing and NPI data. Automatically add essential information, such as national provider identifiers and licensure.
- Clinician affiliations. Track affiliations with healthcare organizations and other relevant data, such as volumes of services provided.
- Expertise tracking. Capture and maintain information on provider areas of expertise based on recent activity (last 12 to 18 months).
- Seamless integration of enriched data. Ensure new data is smoothly incorporated into the management system without affecting future identity resolution decisions.
Quick activation and value realization. A swift setup and integration ensure that the solution delivers value quickly. Focus on:
- Seamless integration. Enable easy connectivity with existing healthcare applications and systems.
- Cloud-first infrastructure. Utilize scalable, cloud-based solutions for faster deployment and operation.
- Data propagation. Ensure consistent data flows across upstream and downstream applications.
- Enterprise-wide analytics. Enable analytics across all domains for comprehensive insights.
Comprehensive and scalable solution. Ensure that the chosen solution offers an all-encompassing, scalable platform designed for healthcare needs. Best practices include:
- Ease of use. Opt for a system that is easy to install and operate, with minimal training requirements.
- Quick time to value. Ensure the system delivers results shortly after implementation.
- Robust security. Prioritize security, with certifications such as HITRUST and SOC2 to protect sensitive healthcare data.
- Healthcare-specific design. Choose a solution tailored to the specific workflows and use cases of healthcare organizations.
- Low maintenance. The system should require minimal ongoing maintenance, with no need for hardware or manual updates.
- Predictable costs. Opt for a solution with an inclusive pricing model that simplifies budgeting and avoids hidden fees.
- Scalability and monitoring. Ensure the system grows with your organization, with features like auto-scaling, system alerts, and automated backups built in for continuous monitoring and performance.
Avishek Mukherjee is chief product and technology officer of Verato, a company that enables digital engagement, clinical interoperability, cloud transformation and provider data integrity.